![]() |
||
Cottlesbridge landscape (1980) oil on canvas 244cm x 198.6cm Purchased, 1981 Untitled 67-68 (1967-1968) oil on canvas 172.6cm x 172.6cm Felton Bequest, 1968.
|
![]() born Australia 1937 In 1980 Hickey wrote in reference to his series of paintings of the Cottlesbridge landscape, painted in 1979-80: I went out painting in the spring of '79 thinking that it was time to confront colour. Cottlesbridge looked typically grey to me and I can remember thinking 'today it's going to be ultramarine, violet, viridian, pink and some yellow'. I did it that way and it worked! It seems simple thus stated, but I had to steel myself to doing it. It was for me a great drama, that first occasion. Subsequently the feeling of drama was replaced by fun. Extract from a letter by Dale Hickey, December 1980, held on file, National Gallery of Victoria.
Historical Context
Community orientated art activities expressing cultural values emerged as a strong
force with expression being found through political murals, street theatre and trade
union art movements. The counter-culture also found expression in punk music and
fashion. Performance art and conceptual art had also now become part of mainstream
art practice with important events such as the Mildura Sculpture Triennial.
Background
Influence
Technique and Materials
For Cottlesbridge landscape Hickey first executed a charcoal outline
drawing on a white ground canvas and then added his colours. Colour areas he
thought unsuitable were either scraped back and repainted or another colour was
painted over the still wet original paint.
The Painting
Hickey's art has been concerned with enlivening the psychological reality of various
urban objects, such as tiles (Untitled), a drinking mug (Cup painting) and
even, as in this painting, the urban bush at Cottlesbridge, located on the outskirts
of suburban Melbourne. Although the objects in his art differ, the concerns are
basically the same. All these objects are, as Hickey said, 'in my head as much
as in front of me'. For Hickey his task is to render the objects as he perceives
them, which will disorient the viewer to various degrees and then allow the viewer
to see the object anew with fresh perception. His paintings make an enquiry into art,
for he has even termed his series of Cottlesbridge landscapes 'Cottlesbridge cubism'.
In this painting our perception must therefore interpret the ambiguities between
natural and artifical colour and pattern and between the cubist ambiguity of flat
and three-dimensional space.
| |||